<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: forty minutes to midnight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jon22.net/forty-minutes-to-midnight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jon22.net/forty-minutes-to-midnight/</link>
	<description>The Website of Jonathan Dobres</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumtumtugger (scott)</title>
		<link>http://www.jon22.net/forty-minutes-to-midnight/comment-page-1/#comment-3332</link>
		<dc:creator>rumtumtugger (scott)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 12:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jon22.net/forty-minutes-to-midnight/#comment-3332</guid>
		<description>notwithstanding the foregoing, i think my favorite entry is the march, 2006 one called &#039;pod person.&#039;  very clever.  quite funny.  somewhat personal.  everyone reading this comment should go back and read it.  i couldn&#039;t stop laughing when i read that the ipod is the size of a graham cracker!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>notwithstanding the foregoing, i think my favorite entry is the march, 2006 one called &#8216;pod person.&#8217;  very clever.  quite funny.  somewhat personal.  everyone reading this comment should go back and read it.  i couldn&#8217;t stop laughing when i read that the ipod is the size of a graham cracker!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumtumtugger (scott)</title>
		<link>http://www.jon22.net/forty-minutes-to-midnight/comment-page-1/#comment-3331</link>
		<dc:creator>rumtumtugger (scott)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jon22.net/forty-minutes-to-midnight/#comment-3331</guid>
		<description>hmmm, yes, i do have some comments.  first of all, the raw, unblemished truth is that blogging can be a grind.  for the most part, it&#039;s a joy (if you like writing and enjoy the process of forming your own opinions and attitudes), but it can be hard to sustain over the long-haul.  i know because i&#039;ve already hit a cerebral roadblock.

i really enjoy checking your blog from time to time because, for the most part, i like your writing style:  it&#039;s breezy, comfortable-with-itself, skillful, slightly edgy, and not too self-conscious.  the problem for all of us is competition:  there are so many things competing for attention that it&#039;s impossible to keep up.  whether you read blogs and write one, there&#039;s always laundry to do and the dishwasher to unload.  so, it&#039;s difficult to squeeze novel, interesting, inventive writing into a blog every day.  the brain starts to emit smoke and tiny sparks.

so, my suggestion is that you occasionally take a cue from the topical bloggers.  pick something in the news that fires your imagination or gets you rightously indignent, and write your &#039;editorial&#039; opinion about that in your daily feed.  as much as i like your site - and as much as i miss it on weekends! - i also think you could let your readers know more about you ... as opposed to your more predictable (albeit entertaining) commentary about some aspect of pop culture.  you&#039;d be infiltrating a larger world, connecting with issues that affect lots of people as opposed to a smaller audience that likes the way you write a movie review.  my advice is think bigger; write yourself a &#039;mission statement&#039;; tackle issues - political, psychological, interpersonal, social ... whatever.  your devoted readership wants to learn more about what makes you tick.  don&#039;t let us down.  we don&#039;t handle disappointment well.

p.s.  i did not proofread this comment, so i disavow any responsibility for errors in punctuation, grammar, or syntax.  there shouldn&#039;t be any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, yes, i do have some comments.  first of all, the raw, unblemished truth is that blogging can be a grind.  for the most part, it&#8217;s a joy (if you like writing and enjoy the process of forming your own opinions and attitudes), but it can be hard to sustain over the long-haul.  i know because i&#8217;ve already hit a cerebral roadblock.</p>
<p>i really enjoy checking your blog from time to time because, for the most part, i like your writing style:  it&#8217;s breezy, comfortable-with-itself, skillful, slightly edgy, and not too self-conscious.  the problem for all of us is competition:  there are so many things competing for attention that it&#8217;s impossible to keep up.  whether you read blogs and write one, there&#8217;s always laundry to do and the dishwasher to unload.  so, it&#8217;s difficult to squeeze novel, interesting, inventive writing into a blog every day.  the brain starts to emit smoke and tiny sparks.</p>
<p>so, my suggestion is that you occasionally take a cue from the topical bloggers.  pick something in the news that fires your imagination or gets you rightously indignent, and write your &#8216;editorial&#8217; opinion about that in your daily feed.  as much as i like your site &#8211; and as much as i miss it on weekends! &#8211; i also think you could let your readers know more about you &#8230; as opposed to your more predictable (albeit entertaining) commentary about some aspect of pop culture.  you&#8217;d be infiltrating a larger world, connecting with issues that affect lots of people as opposed to a smaller audience that likes the way you write a movie review.  my advice is think bigger; write yourself a &#8216;mission statement&#8217;; tackle issues &#8211; political, psychological, interpersonal, social &#8230; whatever.  your devoted readership wants to learn more about what makes you tick.  don&#8217;t let us down.  we don&#8217;t handle disappointment well.</p>
<p>p.s.  i did not proofread this comment, so i disavow any responsibility for errors in punctuation, grammar, or syntax.  there shouldn&#8217;t be any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User is logged in)

Served from: www.jon22.net @ 2012-02-11 06:18:56 -->
