<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ommwriter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jon22.net/ommwriter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jon22.net/ommwriter/</link>
	<description>The Website of Jonathan Dobres</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:09:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sociallytangent</title>
		<link>http://www.jon22.net/ommwriter/comment-page-1/#comment-5806</link>
		<dc:creator>sociallytangent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jon22.net/?p=1023#comment-5806</guid>
		<description>On the PC, I&#039;ve become strongly addicted to Intype. It&#039;s got most of the features of e (and by extension, TextMate) -- but unlike e, it&#039;s superbly responsive and hasn&#039;t ever crashed despite being an alpha. It&#039;s just a text editor, though, rather than a word processor.

Shira, what specific features attract you to Scrivener? I&#039;ve had an idea for a web-based writing application for awhile, but it&#039;s got a slightly different focus than &quot;distraction-free&quot; writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the PC, I&#8217;ve become strongly addicted to Intype. It&#8217;s got most of the features of e (and by extension, TextMate) &#8212; but unlike e, it&#8217;s superbly responsive and hasn&#8217;t ever crashed despite being an alpha. It&#8217;s just a text editor, though, rather than a word processor.</p>
<p>Shira, what specific features attract you to Scrivener? I&#8217;ve had an idea for a web-based writing application for awhile, but it&#8217;s got a slightly different focus than &#8220;distraction-free&#8221; writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shira</title>
		<link>http://www.jon22.net/ommwriter/comment-page-1/#comment-5803</link>
		<dc:creator>Shira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jon22.net/?p=1023#comment-5803</guid>
		<description>I prefer Scrivener to WriteRoom; if you&#039;re trying to keep track of multiple chapters, POVs, timelines, and research, you just can&#039;t beat it. And it has the great full-screen feature, too.

Alas, it&#039;s Mac-only, so we Mac-using writers get to glory in the moaning of the Windows users. Hey, we suffer without killer Windows apps. Now the Windows users get to see what it&#039;s like when someone&#039;s not building an awesome thing for *their* OS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer Scrivener to WriteRoom; if you&#8217;re trying to keep track of multiple chapters, POVs, timelines, and research, you just can&#8217;t beat it. And it has the great full-screen feature, too.</p>
<p>Alas, it&#8217;s Mac-only, so we Mac-using writers get to glory in the moaning of the Windows users. Hey, we suffer without killer Windows apps. Now the Windows users get to see what it&#8217;s like when someone&#8217;s not building an awesome thing for *their* OS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDeeeeZL</title>
		<link>http://www.jon22.net/ommwriter/comment-page-1/#comment-5800</link>
		<dc:creator>GDeeeeZL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jon22.net/?p=1023#comment-5800</guid>
		<description>This post made me think about my first forays into writing as a child.  I didn&#039;t have a computer until I was a senior in high school, you know, right around Y2k. As a young child I first learned how to type and write on an IBM electric typewriter, which was pretty atypical for our generation of computer users (or so I can tell from talking to friends and colleagues who are now in their late twenties).  I would like to see a parody program that accurately recreates the infinitely frustrating experience of typewriting on a computer:  carriage returns, jammed keys etc.  What&#039;s that?  You made a typo?  Well, hit backspace, switch that lever over three notches--now you&#039;re on the whiteout ink band--and retype your mistake.  It didn&#039;t whiteout the whole letter?  Well, keep hitting backspace and keep using the White ribbon until you&#039;ve hammered a whole into the paper; then, move the lever back over to the black ribbon and relentlessly attempt to fill the void you&#039;ve punched into the page with the correct spelling.  Ultimately, you&#039;re left with a nice, mangled reminder of your grammatical shortcomings.

Jokes aside, I do have respect for a time when accurate typing and precision were favored.... And all at 120wpm.  Amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post made me think about my first forays into writing as a child.  I didn&#8217;t have a computer until I was a senior in high school, you know, right around Y2k. As a young child I first learned how to type and write on an IBM electric typewriter, which was pretty atypical for our generation of computer users (or so I can tell from talking to friends and colleagues who are now in their late twenties).  I would like to see a parody program that accurately recreates the infinitely frustrating experience of typewriting on a computer:  carriage returns, jammed keys etc.  What&#8217;s that?  You made a typo?  Well, hit backspace, switch that lever over three notches&#8211;now you&#8217;re on the whiteout ink band&#8211;and retype your mistake.  It didn&#8217;t whiteout the whole letter?  Well, keep hitting backspace and keep using the White ribbon until you&#8217;ve hammered a whole into the paper; then, move the lever back over to the black ribbon and relentlessly attempt to fill the void you&#8217;ve punched into the page with the correct spelling.  Ultimately, you&#8217;re left with a nice, mangled reminder of your grammatical shortcomings.</p>
<p>Jokes aside, I do have respect for a time when accurate typing and precision were favored&#8230;. And all at 120wpm.  Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
